Page 1
Previous Page - i.e. Page 2
This page gets filled in by the review panel, at and/or after the review.
B. RECOMMENDATION OF REVIEW COMMITTEE

1. STATEMENT OF PROGRESS

(a) Specific Achievements

...
...
...
...
...
...

(b) Difficulties Encountered

...
...
...
...
...
...

2. ANY RECOMMENDED ACTION

(a) Research Progress:

...
...
...
...
...

(b) Subject results:

...
...
...
...
...

3. PROGRESS (please tick) ... [ ] UNSATISFACTORY ... [ ] MARGINAL ... [ ] SATISFACTORY

If you get classified as unsatisfactory, the consequence would normally be another review in a few months time, along with a list of specific goals that you would have to achieve by the time of that extra review in order to be reclassified as satisfactory. You are not "out on your ear" immediately after getting an unsatifactory review.
[ ] ... SEMINAR GIVEN (at least for second review)
Date: .....................
[ ] A copy has been given to the candidate by the Head of School or Centre, or his/her delegate

I acknowledge that I have received a copy of the review report. I understand that I have the right to comment in writing on the report to the Head of School.

Signed: Candidate .................................
When the candidate signs this, s/he is acknowledging receipt of a copy, not agreeing to the content of the review document. If the candidate disagreed with the contents of the review document, I would expect that s/he would set out the specifics of the disagreement in writing and send it to the PG Coordinator or Head of School.

Signed: Principal Supervisor .................................
Once again, the supervisor is acknowledging having seen (and presumably received a copy of) the review document.

Signed: Presiding Member of Review Panel .................................

Signed: Head of School or Centre .................................