00:00:00 --- log: started haskell/02.03.05 01:15:48 --- join: xbill (wli@DOMINIA.MIT.EDU) joined #haskell 03:20:18 --- join: Continuum (~continuum@CPE-144-137-134-146.qld.bigpond.net.au) joined #haskell 03:40:01 'lo 03:45:05 --- join: Karsus (~continuum@CPE-144-137-134-115.qld.bigpond.net.au) joined #haskell 03:45:38 hello 03:45:46 oi 03:45:52 oi? 03:46:26 hi 03:46:44 just the wierd way i say hi 03:47:04 ah :-) 03:51:37 --- quit: Igloo (carter.openprojects.net irc.openprojects.net) 03:58:56 --- join: Igloo (~igloo@c93.keble.ox.ac.uk) joined #haskell 03:59:06 --- quit: Igloo (carter.openprojects.net irc.openprojects.net) 04:02:36 --- join: Igloo (~igloo@c93.keble.ox.ac.uk) joined #haskell 04:02:36 --- quit: cuelebre ("adios") 04:03:07 --- quit: Continuum (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 04:11:00 --- quit: Karsus () 08:18:56 --- nick: jlb -> GrumpyBFGCarryingBotHatingBot 09:12:56 --- nick: GrumpyBFGCarryingBotHatingBot -> jlb 11:39:39 --- join: ChoJin (~ask@cha213245038031.chello.fr) joined #haskell 12:09:11 --- join: clausen (~andrew@c17997.eburwd3.vic.optusnet.com.au) joined #haskell 17:30:33 --- quit: ChoJin ("bye !!!") 18:01:32 --- join: foonley (~foonley@syru205-140.syr.edu) joined #haskell 18:36:02 --- join: jao (jao@62-37-169-81.dialup.uni2.es) joined #haskell 19:06:05 --- join: taeshadow (~taeshadow@137.99.136.42) joined #haskell 19:14:17 --- quit: taeshadow (Remote closed the connection) 21:46:21 is there a function in the standard prelude that will take a list and split it into a list of lists? 21:46:59 something like the reverse of concat? 21:47:36 foonley: but where should it split? 21:48:26 what exactly do you have in mind? 21:49:08 well, it would take a list, then break it into a list of lists with each list some given length 21:49:44 I have written a function to do it but I get the feeling someone may have already done it 21:49:46 I don't think there is such a function, but it's probably just a two liner 21:49:52 yah that's what I have 21:50:58 yes, I think that would be usefull in the standard, much more usefull then for example group that are in the standard 21:51:41 what does 'group' do? 21:51:55 groups together equal elements 21:52:06 ah 21:52:14 List> group "aaabbcc" 21:52:14 ["aaa","bb","cc"] 21:52:28 ah nice I see 21:52:35 groupBy is a little more usefull, where you can supply the equality function 21:52:55 hmnn handy 21:53:10 hmm, it's "useful", isn't it 21:53:21 yes 23:59:59 --- log: ended haskell/02.03.05