In article <960518222601_304203646@emout19.mail.aol.com> EdgarSuter@aol.com writes:
>Suter: ...a majority of the homicides were _not_ committed by guns, so could
>not have been committed by Kellermann's scary "guns in the home." How then
>did the "gun in the home" become a risk factor for homicide.
>
>Lambert: Because a significant number of the homicides were committed with
>the gun in the home.
>
>Suter: "Just because" --- _Now_ I understand. Guns in the home are a risk
>factor for non-gun homicide "just because."
GUNS in the home were NOT, I repeat NOT, found to be a risk factor for
non-gun homicide.
That's the third time I've pointed this out to you.
>Suter: I can imagine no explanation for such a phenomenon other than by
>invoking silly anthropomorphic magical thinking - the "magnetize murderers to
>the doorstep" silliness.
Straw man.
Tim