Aside to rest of tpg:
(Don't read this Aldo. I mean it!)
I know I said I would ignore Aldo, but since this policy has prompted
him to become even more abusive, I thought I would try some reverse
psychology. Nobody tell Aldo, or it might not work.
OK, Aldo, you can start reading again.
In article <2tvba7$rlo@panix2.panix.com> liberty@panix.com (Aldo Tartaglini) writes:
> In <2tskhh$lfh@mtu.edu> cescript@mtu.edu (Charles Scripter) writes:
> >On 11 Jun 1994 11:24:19 -0400, Aldo Tartaglini (liberty@panix.com) wrote:
> >> Should I now encourage folks to kill-file Lambert for his "gratuitous
> >> personal attack" on Mr. Scripter? Since I'm not into fascism, the answer
> >> is no.
BTW, Aldo, can you explain to us what is fascist about kill files??
> >Don't worry about it, Aldo.
Aldo, meet Charles. Charles, meet Aldo. I'm sure you two will get
along just famously.
> Lambert often relies on insults to avoid
> >answering hard questions. For example, let's looks at my archives
> [superb examples of Lambert's penchant for ad hominem nonarguments deleted]
Lambert's? Charles included some of his own insults, which he
"accidentally" attributed to me. You also seem to be unaware of what
"ad hominem" means.
> Apparently he also resorts to childish taunts and whiny kill-file threats
Pardon? I have not threatened to kill file you, nor have I kill filed you.
> when his soulmate Pim isn't being treated with sufficient reverence and
> respect.
\begin{sarcasm}
Yes, that's it. Almost everyone in this newsgroup worships Pim.
Fearless individualist Aldo bucked the trend and dared to call Pim
names, so I ruthlessly censored him by suggesting that others ignore him.
\end{sarcasm}
> Mr. Lambert is a good example of the hypocritical anti-gunner type ...
> ... phony moralism ...
> The more folks like Lambert, Furlong, Pim et al. employ
> disinformation and other underhanded tactics ...
> ... villainous characters
> Since Lambert's anti-gun comrades are exceedingly fond of post hoc causal
> attributions (c.f. Pim's fetish for Cook, Loftin, etc.), I know they'll
> agree when I suggest that Lambert's silence regarding his model
> unequivocally proves that he is as intellectually vacuous as he is morally
> bankrupt.
Thanks, now that winter's here I could use a few flames for warmth.
I see you have taken my advice and picked up a few pointers from
Charles.
Oh, and can you tell us if cigarette smoking causes lung cancer in
humans?
Tim