UK defensive gun use

What does Hill say about self-defence with weapons?

Subject: What does Hill say about self-defence with weapons?
From: lambert@cse.unsw.edu.au (Tim Lambert)
Date: 20 Jun 1996 17:21:08 +1000
In-reply-to: Clayton_Cramer's message of Fri, 14 Jun 1996 09:05:56 -0700
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns, uk.misc, alt.politics.british
Organization: CS&E, Uni of NSW, Australia
References: <4p691j$8to@news.ox.ac.uk> <4p7l3p$fb0@news2.delphi.com> <31C18DE4.773C2448@optilink.dsccc.com>
Sender: lambert@alboka.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU

In article <31C18DE4.773C2448@optilink.dsccc.com> Clayton_Cramer <Clayton_Cramer@optilink.dsccc.com> writes:

>Tim Lambert wrote:

>> The section in Hill's book on self-defence with weapons (p 57-60) does
>> not contain any statement remotely like the claim above about deadly
>> force being legal only against similarly armed attackers.  It states
>
>I guess I just imagined it all, right?  It was clear, and quite surprising 
>to me.

I have scanned in the relevant pages of Hill's book so that anyone
interested can see for themselves what it says.  Point a browser at:

http://www.cse.unsw.EDU.AU/~lambert/guns/archive/ukdgu/hill.html

Tim

Prev by Date: What does Hill say about self-defence with weapons?
Index(es):
- Date

Top | Index | My weblog