Organisation and Structure of Debates
Debates will be run in weeks 5 and 6.
| A team | Affirmative—for the motion |
| B team | Negative—against the motion |
Schedule
| Debates will be run in weeks 5 & 6 |
|
Presentation
A concise guide to debate structure and judging can be found on the Resources page
of the Debating Society of Victoria web site.
This site is a reference for those unfamiliar with formal debates. Please have a
look at the information under Introduction to Debating especially:
A very brief precis follows:
-
Introduction
- The first speaker from each team should spend 2 minutes (out
of the allotted 5) on a team introduction. The introduction should present
the other speakers and also set the scene for the team’s argument. The A
team opens.
-
Main body of debate
- Each team member will debate the topic for no more
than 5 minutes each. The A team will open and speakers from the two
teams will alternate. As well as presenting arguments, the speakers should
attempt to rebut the the arguments of the opposing team.
-
Summation
- The last speaker from each team should spend 2 minutes (out of
the allotted 5) on a final summation of the team’s argument. The B team
has the last word.
-
4 person teams
- Where a 3-person team is debating against a 4-person, one
person from the the 3-person team will be allowed to speak twice, as a
second last speaker.
During discussion each speaker will be given a warning 1 minute before the end of
their allotted time. They must finish at the end of that minute.
Assessment
The final mark for this component is 10% of the total (100%).
The marking will be done according to the following scheme and the result
adjusted to a mark out of 10.
|
|
| Team | Individual |
|
|
| Coherance | 2 marks | | Coverage | 2 marks |
| | | | Method | 2 marks | | Manner | 2 marks |
| Matter | 2 marks | | | |
|
|
| |
All marks maximum.
Additionally, there will be 1 mark for attendance at the debate sessions.
A blank marking guide can found here, but marking sheets customised to each
debate will be provided by the facilitator at the time of the debate.
Debate Topics
The following topics are subject to change.
- Academics of the School should have general right of access to student
accounts
- All Information should be Free
- Computers Can’t Be Trusted
- Ethics and Morals are Simply a State of Mind
- Ethics and Professional Success are Incompatible
- Ethics and Software Quality Control are Mutually Independent
- Ethics is the Responsibility of Management, Not the Software
Implementor
- Security is More Important than Privacy
- Software is Intrinsically Faulty and hence is Incompatible with Ethics
- The Anarchy of the Internet makes it Intrinsically Unethical
- The Internet is a Strongly Democratic Medium
- The Internet is a Tool for the Good of Humankind
- Computers Help People Communicate
- The Internet is the School of the Future
- The Internet Brings the World Closer Together
- All software contains bugs, therefore it’s acceptable to deliver software
with known bugs
- It is unethical to develop a software solution when it is not the most
appropriate solution
- Safety critical software should be Open Source
- Using unlicenced software may be illegal, but it can be ethical
- Good software engineers are ethical professionals
- Software development may be professionally sound and legal but still
unethical
- Software requires it own ethical theory
- Ethics in software is theoretical not practical
- Professional programmers should be licensed
- Software engineers are real engineers/Computer science is a true science
- Sometimes you can blame the computer
- Digital Rights Management (DRM) may be legal, but it’s not ethical
- To protect its citizens, Governments should have the right to monitor its
citizens in cyberspace.
- Internet filtering is ethical.
- Software patents are unethical.
- Laws to protect intellectual property stifles creativity and is unethical.
- Software companies have a moral obligation to produce products that are
”fit for purpose”.
- Software companies should never be held responsible for software failures.
- Computing professionals are morally and ethically obliged to take personal
responsibility for all the software they produce.
- It’s not our fault! Software always fails, we cannot be held responsible.
- “Hands off, my information is mine.” No one should have a right to it.
- Identity theft is the fault of poor ethical practices.
- Electronic surveillance is justified; it reduces crime
- Internet companies are free to use my data as they wish
- The prevalence of social media means the end of quality journalism