Abstracts
Formal Models in Industry Standard Tools: An Argos Block within Simulink
Simulink is widely used within industry for simulation and model-driven development, and reactive behaviours are often modelled using an add-on called Stateflow. Argos is one of the synchronous languages that have been proposed for the specification, validation and implementation of reactive systems. It is a rigorously defined graphical notation which, although not as powerful as Stateflow, is much less complicated. This paper describes the implementation of an Argos block for Simulink.
- Available in F. E. Tay, editor, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: Selected Papers from the 2005 International Conference on Embedded and Hybrid Systems, volume 15(2), pages 389–395, Singapore, April 2005.
- The slides are online.
A Timing Model for Synchronous Language Implementations in Simulink
We describe a simple scheme for mapping synchronous language models, in the form of Boolean Mealy Machines, into timed automata. The mapping captures certain idealised implementation details that are ignored, or assumed away, by the synchronous paradigm. In this regard, the scheme may be compared with other approaches such as the AASAP semantics. However, our model addresses input latching and reaction triggering differently. Additionally, the focus is not on model-checking but rather on creating a semantic model for simulating synchronous controllers within Simulink.
The model considers both sample-driven and event-driven execution paradigms, and clarifies their similarities and differences. It provides a means of analysing the timing behaviour of small-scale embedded controllers. The integration of the timed automata models into Simulink is described and related work is discussed.
- Published in Proceedings of the Sixth ACM & IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software, pages 93–101, Seoul, October 2006.
- Conference acceptance rate: 33% (31/94)
- The slides are online.
- This version includes a correction to the last sentence on page 7.
Reliable device drivers require well-defined protocols
Current operating systems lack well-defined protocols for interaction with device drivers. We argue that this hinders the development of reliable drivers and thereby undermines overall system stability. We present an approach to specify driver protocols using a formalism based on state machines. We show that it can simplify device programming, facilitate static analysis of drivers against protocol specifications, and enable detection of incorrect behaviours at runtime.
- Published in Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Hot Topics in System Dependability, article 3, Edinburgh, June 2007.
- This workshop presentation describes Ryzhyk's work. I co-developed the underlying model, which applies much from Argos, Statecharts, and ultimately the idea of constraint-oriented specification originating in CSP and LOTOS.
Automatically transforming and relating Uppaal models of embedded systems
Relations between models are important for effective automatic validation, for comparing implementations with specifications, and for increased understanding of embedded systems designs. Timed automata may be used to model a system at multiple levels of abstraction, and timed trace inclusion is one way to relate the models.
It is known that a deterministic and tau-free timed automaton can be transformed such that reachability analysis can decide timed trace inclusion with another timed automaton. Performing the transformation manually is tedious and error-prone. We have developed a tool that does it automatically for a large subset of Uppaal models.
Certain features of the Uppaal modeling language, namely selection bindings and channel arrays, complicate the transformation. We formalize these features and extend the validation technique to incorporate them. We find it impracticable to manipulate some forms of channel array subscripts, and some combinations of selection bindings and universal quantifiers; doing so either requires premature parameter instantiation or produces models that Uppaal rejects.
- Published in Proceedings of the Eighth ACM & IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software, pages 59–68, Atlanta USA, October 2008.
- Conference acceptance rate: 25% (28/110)
- This paper contains important improvements to an earlier technical report: UNSW-CSE-TR0723.
- Most of the techniques described in the paper are implemented in a tool called urpal.
- The slides are online.