Comments from Ron van der Meyden on Richard's Computer Forensics Proposal

Re Richard's proposal: he seems to think that a revised submission
of 9441 is needed. Its not clear to me why. The document I sent him is
just the orginal proposal that I submitted. He has been teaching
somewhat different material, but the intentions for the "new" crypto
course seem to be just the original intentions. Details of the last
time I did the course are still here:

http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~meyden/cs3441

If Richard never put through a revision for his changes to content, I
don't see that it is really necessary to make any changes to 9441 as
far as the university is concerned (except maybe changing the course
code, if that is necessary).

However, the relationship to Wireless Security needs to be looked
at. I guess Richard OK'd this on the basis that he was teaching the
different material, but I suspect that there may be a larger overlap
with the old version.  (I would personally need to be persuaded that
the wireless crypto course is a good idea.  There is probably far less
that is special about the wireless setting than is being made out --
except for the fact that the wireless security standards have a history
of being notoriously badly designed.)