next up previous contents
Next: ECG conclusions Up: ECG Previous: Experimental results   Contents

Comprehensibility

We suspected that part of the cause of the lacklustre accuracy performance of TClass was the issue of pruning with such a large dataset. Hence we investigated by setting the minimum number of instances ($ m$) at each leaf. For example, we tried $ m=42$. For the PART learner, the error rate actually decreased slightly to 40.5 per cent, while the average number of rules was reduced from 94 rules to 24 rules. A set of 24 rules for recognising ECGs with a 40.5 per cent error rate, when a human expert has a 30 per cent error rate is quite an accomplishment.

Still, it is hard to study the comprehensibility of such rules. Hence we used the binary classification rules approach as used on the Auslan datasets to see if there were any intelligent concepts that could be deduced. The results are shown in Figure 6.37.

To gain some insight as to whether this was a useful rule, it was compared with the rules used by a commercial ECG classifier based on an expert system [A97][*]. The definitions produced shows the same characteristics as the definitions produced in this manner for the Auslan domains: the first few rules provide a ``first cut'' exclusion. The third rule looks for a very low minimum on the X value. This is because patients with RVH have a depression in the S wave [A97], leading to a very large minimum x value. In de Chazal's work [dC98] (page 179), he found that the minimum x value is the most discriminant feature based on rank-correlation analysis. The other criteria look for local maxima in the aVL and Z channels that are unique to right ventricular hypertrophy cases: the T wave is biphasic, i.e. rather than having a single maximum, it has two maxima; while most normal heartbeats will have one maximum occurring slightly later (around time 0.7) [A97].

Figure 6.37: A two way classifier for the RVH class in the ECG domain.
\begin{figure}\footnotesize\begin{boxedverbatim}PART decision list
-----------...
...H (62.0/14.0)Number of Rules : 6\end{boxedverbatim}\normalsize\par\end{figure}

Figure 6.38: Events referenced by Figure 6.37.
\begin{figure}\footnotesize\begin{boxedverbatim}Event index
-----------
*1: lm...
...0]
value=-24.93 r=[-296.24,42.04]\end{boxedverbatim}\normalsize\par\end{figure}


next up previous contents
Next: ECG conclusions Up: ECG Previous: Experimental results   Contents
Mohammed Waleed Kadous 2002-12-10